SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (329851)3/22/2007 7:21:59 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574848
 
"Clinton's actions where worse. He fired all of the prosecutors."

Because he did what any other incoming president of a different party did? How many Clinton USAs did Dubya keep? Or Reagan of Carter's? I suspect you will find that number is pretty close to zero. There is a good reason for that. Being a USA means that passing Congressional approval for a federal judgeship is a snap. So they are plums for either party. No way they are going to let that fall to the opposition party.

So, why was Clinton's actions worse?



To: TimF who wrote (329851)3/24/2007 2:41:49 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574848
 
Are you equating the firing of USAs hired under the previous administration of a different party to firing USAs appointed by the person firing them

Not exactly equating. Clinton's actions where worse. He fired all of the prosecutors.

How many times does the difference between what Bush/Rove/Gonzales did and what Clinton did have to be presented to you before you get it?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News