Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (15758)	3/22/2007 12:24:25 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 218152

extending the hand Be advised that Mq has employed me as his hired gun, advocate, avocat, barrister, solicitor, abogado, avocado, and jack-of-all-legal-trades with regard to your failure to grovel in a most humbled way before he deigns to even consider returning to this den of iniquity in a more regular manner. He is paying handsomely for my services, in .50 hour minimum increments for all activity at the rate of the current price of an ounce of gold per hour, and I will therefore take a lot of time and effort to protect his cyber interests. My brief is well lubricated by Mq's deep pockets so be ready for my legal assault on the citadel of your alleged discretion to ban, raise eyebrows, insult, libel, defame, and otherwise cause emotional anguish and distress to my client. Mq is not a hacker, never was, never will be. Issuing a formal apology, notarized in all major languages, posted in a full page ad of all editions of the WSJ, acknowledging that Mq accidentally somehow, someway de-banned himself and/or you de-banned him and forgot to note doing so, is a good starting point for the apologetic grovelling Mq requires. Then there is the issue of suitable compensation for my client. He has nightmares concerning the matter, has been seen by professionals who have opined that it is unlikely that he will recover soon from the assault on his sensibilities. Treating him for these maladies will of course be very expensive, particularly as there are no qualified professionals in NZ who are able to treat him. And his finances have suffered, too, as a result of this intentional infliction of emotional distress on your part. Although I have cautioned him, he insists on investing in such trash as Globalstar. The enormous profits he realized as a result of his visionary early investment in QCOM are slowly being eroded thanks to your negligence. I have retained world class experts on the psychology of investing to establish what you may think is a tenuous link between what you have done and Mq's increasingly imprudent investment strategies. Please propose a suitable grovelling apology and figure, which I will relay to Mq with either a recommendation to accept it or to go forward with litigation in a number of countries and fronts. [Just kidding]

To: elmatador who wrote (15758)	3/22/2007 5:00:20 PM
From: Snowshoe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 218152

>>I am extending the hand to MQ as a civil man!<< I believe Mq is looking for this... <g>

To: elmatador who wrote (15758)	3/22/2007 9:17:52 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218152

ElM, if I make a mistake, I don't do trading in apologies, I am simply sorry for what I did. <Apologize for the hacking. I apologize for being haste > I am indifferent to your half-baked apology and don't want it. What is important for your own benefit is to recognize that you are better off to be more considered in your approach to people than simply whacking them one. Leave that to Islamic Jihad and other authoritarian megalomaniacs. For example, I was sorry about my post which you asked me to change which might have inconvenienced you in your venture to Iran, and I was able to change it before edit time was up. I would have been very sorry if my jest had led you to problems. I might have been very sorry indeed! I didn't need a trade. I realized I was wrong in what I had done. I certainly don't apologize for my hacking which was a lot of fun and even more fun was you taking the bait! Apologize for that? No way. I would do it again right now if I could. So, shall we sing Kumbaya? I don't have the ElM megalomaniac STRONG MAN version, but I could hum along while you sing. Mqurice