Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Math Junkie who wrote (29287)	3/22/2007 3:05:51 PM
From: Kirk ©	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

No, you are not arrogant, just pathetic like a Moonie who denies the obvious and hangs on to harassing Brinker's critics for nearly decade now.

To: Math Junkie who wrote (29287)	3/22/2007 8:08:43 PM
From: dijaexyahoo	Respond to of 42834

math said: <<Dija, did you see where Kirk accused Alan Coleman of being intellectually dishonest?>> --No. I missed that one math. Thanks for letting us know! << Isn't it interesting how personal attacks against non-Bashers are OK over there?>> --'Interesting' isn't the word I would use. -:) Personal attacks AND insults have always been OK over there, as long as they are done by bashers against non-bashers. Anyone who doesn't believe that need only go back to the archives during my last months of posting on the "free discussion" board. kirk said (according to math): "I don't appreciate your questioning what we say is a fact when you don't have a stich [sic] of evidence to the contrary. It is counter productive and intellectually dishonest." math responds: <<So "questioning what we say is a fact" is intellectually dishonest unless you have evidence to the contrary. Unbelievable!>> --Well, it certainly isn't "unbelieveable." One of the things that led to my banishment was kirk posting accusations against people, and me asking him for evidence. <<Now personally, I agree with Kirk's opinion on the identity of Don Lane, and I have even written that I was 100% sure of it, but personally, I am not arrogant enough to believe that my being 100% sure about something constitutes proof.>> --Right. I'm basically sure of it too, but I certainly don't expect others to accept my verdict without seeing all the evidence for themselves. It really boggles the mind what goes on over there.