SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: neolib who wrote (228918)3/25/2007 8:21:13 PM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
At any rate, I'd say AMD's 65nm SOI process is a more complex one than Intel's non-SOI 65nm process.

If true, that would be a bad thing, given the results.

If Elmer is right that a teardown of Brisbane has revealed that they took out strain for 65nm, it would add a lot to the idea that something went badly wrong with AMD's 65nm development process, and they had to fall back to something simpler to get it out (late).

For ref:

investorshub.com



To: neolib who wrote (228918)3/26/2007 11:53:36 AM
From: smooth2oRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
But, there are rumors circulating that AMD is not using SOI @ 65nm...

Smooth