Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (225736)	3/30/2007 8:41:44 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Absolutely. But Iran is not attacking America, it is trying to solidify its position in Iraq, which makes complete sense, since it is a neighbor of Iraq. You can argue that after the US invaded Iraq and occupied it, the influence of Iran in the civil war in Iraq is an "attack" on America, and thus justifies attacks on Iran, but I think that's a stupid position to take. I don't expect you to agree with me. Makes me wonder just how many wars we can bootstrap ourselves in to before Bush finally leaves office.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (225736)	3/30/2007 9:03:45 PM
From: bentway	Respond to of 281500

Who killed the other 3200?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (225736)	3/30/2007 9:04:08 PM
From: bentway	Respond to of 281500

..about 200 American servicemen have been killed by new Iranian-made shaped charges." Who killed the other 3200? Admit it Nadine, you just want America STUCK in the ME for your Israeli buddies.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (225736)	3/31/2007 4:18:15 PM
From: Garden Rose	Respond to of 281500

Nadine, not much different than the Israelis operating inside Palestinian territories and killing people with American-made hardware, or dropping all those banned cluster bombs in Lebanon that are killing civillians.