SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (16564)4/6/2007 2:04:35 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 217901
 
Wrong again! Forget pseudo-science. You make a statement. Then you consistently find arguments to empower your case. The more arguments you find that builds your case, the closer you are to truth. In short, the more power your statement has.

TJ's statement, that Gold is going to replace paper-money, works this way I am teaching, above, because you don't know it. And I'm serioulsy doubting you have the capacity to grasp the concept.

To counter argue TJ, or anyone else for that matter, you don't need to go to physics. Just try to destroy his case by counter arguing him, with your own statement. So far his case still stands in the lapse of time 2001 - 2007.

I'm not saying it will stand in 2017, but again, to serve his purpose, his case need only to survive until he cash in on it.

Now compare with your case: You bet your underwear on a piece of technology? When we know, for a fact, that technologies are superseded by better, cheaper technologies at a fast and faster rate?

But let me step back here a bit to destroy your predictability thing.

You rise from a certain time in history when the science Deus ex machina held youngster and awe.

I touched that when I was explaining why young people today embrace IT while in your era they embrace nuclear technology.

You need to go back to where you raise to prove your point, even though we know that those scientific "proofs" are totally and absolutely irrelevant to deal with today's world.

I'm trying here to discover how comes, I have been constantly moving with the world and how comes some people calcify in what was important by the time they were 18 years old.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (16564)4/6/2007 2:09:55 AM
From: abuelita  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217901
 
maurice -

did you know that canadians are
virtuosos of the shrug, using subtle
nuances of hands, eyes, shoulders,
and lips to convey countless meanings.

rose shrugs her shoulders, parts her
hands, palms up, in front of her while
raising her eyebrows and says (pick one)

i agree

i disagree

i don’t care

what can I do?

who knows?

you are a fool

do as you like

you could be right

ICNTYHHIAL

g'nite.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (16564)4/6/2007 7:52:35 PM
From: Snowshoe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217901
 
>>TJ is completely irrational, but entirely predictable, when he asserts that the inevitable is coming and not only that, but he KNOWS what that inevitability will be.<<

TJ wrestles with his inner demons by trying to predict that which already happened.