Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: iggyl who wrote (62256)	4/9/2007 11:04:11 AM
From: edwin k.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 197002

Get Lost.

To: iggyl who wrote (62256)	4/9/2007 11:17:28 AM
From: GO*QCOM	Respond to of 197002

Rationale in front of and behind your statements hold about as much creditability as Nokia's claims that there WCDMA glove compartment patents are superior then QUALCOMM's core engine patents. Further more this is not a forum for proper spelling but it is a forum for contributions from anyone who knows the facts behind the technology which obviously has always been stated accurately and well regarded by members here who appreciate such contributions.The real frustration you may be feeling might be that you don't understand what is stated in such contributions and so you concentrate on the only things that you could pick out to criticize such as spelling. Everyone here knows any idiot can fix the spelling errors with a spell check but few could present the genius of what works in the radio frequency world like Engineer.By the way could you chek my speling I used a spell chck just for you.