Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rkral who wrote (62713)	4/16/2007 10:20:44 PM
From: ohohyodafarted	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197035

If I am not mistaken, that was when the NOK POS6 announced they were asking the EU to look into Qualcomm for not dealing in a FRANDLY way and were asking the EU to consider sanctions against QCOM. I would consider NOK as the instigator of the entire affair and likely organized the support of the other companies involved. The whole thing has been orchestrated by NOK right from the start IMHO

To: rkral who wrote (62713)	4/16/2007 10:44:42 PM
From: Rich Bloem	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 197035

Rkral, I can't believe you would ask such a question. What have you been watching the past year ??

To: rkral who wrote (62713)	4/17/2007 1:21:11 AM
From: engineer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197035

How about a highly statistical impossible stochastic event of BRCM announcing a lawsuit, NOK6 filing on the EU, NOK filing on a bunch of patents protests and lawsuits all in a span of 2.5 weeks. Go check it out. Mid July last year. did a tour bus of lawyers crash outside the front offices of all these on the same day? I think not...

To: rkral who wrote (62713)	4/17/2007 6:33:42 PM
From: SirWalterRalegh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197035

The most significant QCOM decline recently has been from the low 50s in May '06 to the low 30s in Aug. What Nokia "news" release or releases caused that? (Please be specific.) rkral- I am unable to be more specific because i don't keep copious files. Others like you have. I think I could have stated my "feelings" better. This is what I think of NOK... deceptive liars purveyors of 1/2 truths legal maneuvers designed to stall progress in resolving an issue(s) (IDC, QCOM) stuck and fixated on old and inferior engineering dishonorable company in a similar vein to their friend Siemens et al. In some ways i don't fault the analysts because the subject is so complex. So NOK takes advantage of them by feeding them false information year after year. So the FUD accumulates and investors seek other avenues and sell QCOM resulting in downward pressure on the stock price. To summarize, I am taking an overall view not pin pointing a NOK public relations piece to a specific drop in QCOM stock price. Rick