Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (227381)	4/17/2007 12:14:05 PM
From: lazarre	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

maybe you've been had... and/or both of us. Davis, also, could have said what we both posted to both sources.

To: epicure who wrote (227381)	4/17/2007 4:07:26 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

This quote- the one you post- does not appear to be legitimate. It's an interesting question. The first lines of quote in the Star-Tribune and the "illegitimate" quote match. The Star-Tribune does not give a second line; the "illegitimate" quote does. Now, did President Davis utter the second line? And if he did, why did the Star-Tribune not report it? Liberal papers (and the Strib is a very liberal paper) have a track record of downplaying reports about threats and intimidation from Islamist groups, so if Davis did say it, they probably would not have reported it. But did Davis say it? That is the question, and we haven't got to the bottom of it yet. I think I'll ask the guys at Powerline blog; they are in Minnesota and interested in such questions.