Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Condor who wrote (38451)	4/17/2007 6:49:30 PM
From: marcos	Respond to of 78410

A bit harsh there wasn't he - Message 23466429 Well they did have quite a delay and have hedged some, people don't like either phenomenon, fact of life, and of course this is why it's so cheap today ... i had to think long and hard before getting any epm.to, still don't have all that much, under six per cent of p.f. ... more because they're in a Chaostan [which was a big part of why they were delayed] than because of the hedging, which is pretty moderate imho Same with First Nickel, no hedging there but they had delays in their programme last year, serious little problems en route to ramping up production, plus management issues and Falco blowing out paper, etc ... takes time to work out the effects of these things on the chart, people remember the bad stuff longest ... as to why some focus solely on it on a thread, don't know, just takes all kinds i guess, DAK has been in better moods than the recent one, if memory serves lth.v - Lithic closed bid .60 ... looks like they may have lined up a driller, heinz, or at least tripped across the number of one scrawled on a phone booth? ... remains to be seen whether Kaiser gets his loonie level before the assays come in

To: Condor who wrote (38451)	4/17/2007 8:26:25 PM
From: LLCF	Respond to of 78410

<Whats up with LLCF pushing EPM as a poster child for bum plays on financing terms? > I didn't say it was a bum play... I noted potential issues with their financing deal which was posted on this board in the past. I just wish the companies would make public the particulars of their financing... which is exactly the cruxt of that piece I was responding to. dAK PS. I'm long a LOT of EPM and warrants... and I "hope" this sector doesn't have it's share of Gibson Greetings thanks to the banksters.