SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (334938)4/23/2007 4:17:37 PM
From: Road Walker  Respond to of 1573959
 
2007 war spending bill at a glance By The Associated Press
1 hour, 14 minutes ago


House and Senate Democrats tentatively have agreed to 2007 war spending legislation that:

• Funds more than $90 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

• Begins withdrawal of troops from Iraq on Oct. 1, with the goal of ending combat by April 1, 2008.

• Requires troop withdrawal to begin July 1 if President Bush cannot certify that the Iraqi government is making progress in disarming militias, reducing sectarian violence and forging political agreements.

• Restricts foreign aid spending in Iraq if benchmarks are not met.

• Allows Bush to keep troops in Iraq after the withdrawal date to conduct counterterrorism missions, protect U.S. infrastructure and personnel and train Iraqi security forces.

• Bars deployment of troops not deemed "fully mission capable" and limits combat tours to one year for Army units and seven months for Marines. Allows president to waive these restrictions.

• Adds about $25 billion not requested by Bush for medical care for troops and veterans, aid to the victims of Hurricane Katrina, farm disaster relief and other programs.

• Raise the minimum wage from $5.15 to $7.25 an hour. Includes $4.8 billion in tax cuts for small businesses over 10 years.



To: tejek who wrote (334938)4/23/2007 4:22:04 PM
From: d[-_-]b  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573959
 
What may have been appropriate a century or two centuries ago may not be appropriate now

So you now acknowledge the past interpretation of the 2nd has always been an individual right?