Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (228594)	4/24/2007 11:31:43 PM
From: Garden Rose	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Chris, what I am saying is the US should take an active role, even if they have to arm-twist Israel into agreement. The US should decide, not Israel, that pre-1967 borders in Israel are to be established, period. Put in our bases and sit on our rears. Fun and games over and no more loss of American lives to maintain Israeli security. GR

To: bentway who wrote (228594)	4/25/2007 11:39:29 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Thats more of a fair analysis than i am used to from you chris. As relates to borders, the real issue is EJ--the contiguous settlements are part of that. Pals would probably agree to some border adjustments in a settlement that returned EJ and ceded other land to compensate. Thats assuming of course they give up on terrorism, other than symbolic right on return to pre-67 israel lands, recognzize israel permanent presence in the region with those new borders with all the arab states signing on as well. Then the 60 year war would finally be over and we could argue about something else.