SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (336353)5/4/2007 12:23:29 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1580035
 
You would think if they had just one capable guy stand up against the war he would immediately capture the lead.

60% of the country against it maybe, but not 60% of Republicans. Also having a majority think the war was a mistake, isn't the same as having a majority think we should pull out now (or in a year or whatever).



To: Road Walker who wrote (336353)5/4/2007 5:18:52 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580035
 
"They all want to be the second coming of our Lord Reagen. "

Yeah! NOBODY claims to be a "Bush" Republican...



To: Road Walker who wrote (336353)5/4/2007 6:06:45 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580035
 
>Chuck Hagel should enter the race. He's a guy that might be able to get my vote.

Based on what, other than the war?

-Z



To: Road Walker who wrote (336353)5/4/2007 8:18:18 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580035
 
Amazing you've got 60% of the US public against the war and you line up 10 Republican candidates and they all support the war (except the libertarian of course). You would think if they had just one capable guy stand up against the war he would immediately capture the lead.

The GOP is running on its own track. It doesn't care what Americans think.