Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Truth About Islam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Keith Feral who wrote (7441)	5/8/2007 4:49:45 PM
From: Ichy Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20106

3 of the guys in this attack are in the US illegally. Their families should be on the boat even as we speak. They can apply to come back if/when the innocence of their family members are proved, if they are acceptable. The return trip should be at their expense, and immediate. If there are children who were born in the US they should be told to go to the US Embassy when they are 18.

To: Keith Feral who wrote (7441)	5/9/2007 10:00:06 AM
From: FJB	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20106

It's another thing when you think about the families of the kids from Leeds that blew up the London subway system. I think there should be some careful thought about exiling families of convicted terrorists. It makes some degree of sense to me, if the jihadis know their family will be returned to the ME as a result of their actions. It might establish some degreeof slef doubt, as the risks to the family outweigh the risks of jihad to the individual. No. The bombers were not radicalized by their families, so holding them responsible is unjust. The polls seem to indicate older Muslims in the UK are more reasonable than their offspring.