SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Oil Sands and Related Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Metacomet who wrote (16217)5/15/2007 8:45:22 PM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25575
 
Both PBG and CLL's oil sands assets are discounted because there's a risk of their development being delayed. The bottleneck is getting extraction facilities constructed in a timely fashion and within reasonable cost parameters (Pod One costs are balooning and they've yet to complete construction on that one). I think PBG's assets are less discounted because there's some credibility gaining in THAI and their ability to deliver.



To: Metacomet who wrote (16217)5/16/2007 3:02:09 PM
From: I_C_Deadpeople  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25575
 
This debate is old.

Using the same criteria as PBG, CLL has over 5 billion barrels.


How did you calculate this?



To: Metacomet who wrote (16217)5/16/2007 5:13:23 PM
From: maverick61  Respond to of 25575
 
Here is a simple question. Why is this an either or debate. Why not hold both CLL and PBG? you seem hellbent for some reason on bashing PBG - perhaps because CLL isn't performing.

I like both - and am happy I hold both because PBG has more than made up for CLL's lack of performance


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News