Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : New FADG. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (407)	5/19/2007 8:59:01 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4152

Since oil is a fungible market, and that undeveloped oil is as likely to be shipped to Japan, as it is to the Lower '48, some would claim that it makes sense to keep a reserve available within our borders that can be tapped in the event of a national emergency (another oil embargo). The SPR will only last so long before it would be drained. If your still on the same subject of the Point Thompson field that part aspect [above] doesn't apply. It's an undeveloped field. In a national emergency it's still an undeveloped field. Even if you're suggesting that the undeveloped Point Thompson field would be a reserve of some sort, so would ANWR. Basically, I need more facts. How big is the ANWR deposit to the one you've referenced related to Exxon? That's not the comparison I would look for, so I wish you luck. Once you get to be a real "Mr. President" you'll have people that can look that up for you. jttmab