Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (98436)	5/17/2007 10:20:22 PM
From: JeffA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Not even close you stupid twit. You posted the article. The article said $/watt. Good try at a cover, but it is simply more ignorant BS from your side. Electrcity is what I do for a living so you may as well quit trying to cover the stupidity of the article you posted and be quiet, not that I think that is possible from you, but we can hope. So, Lord high smartass, do you pay $1/KWH? LMAO!!! The article is so stupid and so far off the mark you should simply drop it and apologize for posting it. If you pay that much, I will sell you power at HALF THE COST with my new innovation! It is a BS burner that YOU fuel yourself! LOL. God, fish in a barrel. You on solar and AS on guns. ::walks off laughing::

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (98436)	5/17/2007 10:27:33 PM
From: JeffA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Hey liz in all fairness, since I know you would be fair given the chance. We are talking about two different things. However, it is still funny how the chosen vernacular of your side discussing this really should be corrected. It's not $/watt nor, God forbid even comparable to KCAL, but you may get away with "Capital cost per installed watt." Which has nothing to do with the original post, at least in the context it was posted. $1/watt. still laughing. This is the part YOU bolded These rolls, the companies say, will be able to provide energy for prices as low as the electricity currently provided by utilities, which averages $1 per watt. That is wrong.