Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : New FADG. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (498)	5/20/2007 11:54:13 AM
From: kumar	Respond to of 4152

thanks Hawk. your post merits some thought on my part before I do a knee-jerk response. will get back to you soon.

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (498)	5/20/2007 8:53:36 PM
From: kumar	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4152

Afghanistan didn't even possess an organized army, while Iraq did. The capability of the Iraqi army (or lack of capability), was demonstrated in Gulf War 1. Afghanistan was already in the midst of a civil war Iraq would have been in a similar situation, were it not for a brutal dictator, who had no problems disposing off opponents. the conditions were right in Afghanistan's state of anarchy, to throw money and firepower around to convince the local warlords to recognize a mutual agenda, the fall of the Taliban. But now that the Taliban has fallen 2 points here : 1 Did we really throw enuff money and firepower ? If yes, what are the tangible results ? 2 Are we sure the Taliban is eliminated ? Everything I read says they are rebuilding.