Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (XMSR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pcstel who wrote (3369)	5/22/2007 5:17:01 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3386

LOL!! However if you go back to "late last year".. What you will find is just the opposite. You will find Mr. RayB blaming SIRI's, and I quote... "significant reception problems" on exactly that.. SIRI's choice of of the "satellite configuration" during the initial "engineering phase" of the constellation. You are a liar. I have said, from the outset, that SIRI's reception is generally inferior to XM's as a result of their satellite configuration. And many, many other [informed people, which excludes you] agree. Message boards are FULL of complaints about SIRI's reception dating back to its inception. That is DIFFERENT from the problem they had late last year which I blamed on their testing of HM. Totally unrelated subject. A perusal of SBS will make it clear that I am correct on both counts, and that you are a flat-out liar. Of course, anyone with any gumption who reads this thread already knows that.