Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : New FADG. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kumar who wrote (806)	5/23/2007 7:34:22 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 4152

But are the underlings better?? If they are, would they have been underlings ?

To: kumar who wrote (806)	5/23/2007 7:42:46 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4152

u kill a Don in the Mafia, another one springs up to replace him. its exactly the same with AQ. But if you kill enough Dons at once, or remove them from action, you can put certain 'families' out of business. Young thugs are always plentiful, it's the seasoned officers who are hard to replace.

To: kumar who wrote (806)	5/23/2007 8:16:05 PM
From: Ish	Respond to of 4152

<<u kill a Don in the Mafia, another one springs up to replace him. its exactly the same with AQ.>> They nailed John Gotti and his son replaced him. John Jr. was a complete fuck up.

To: kumar who wrote (806)	5/24/2007 8:50:02 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4152

Thats silly Kumar. If you take out tony sopranos entire crew at the Bing, there is no succession. We might actually get to see something like this happen in the next two episodes. I dont understand why most folks on this thread minimize the importance of not getting bin laden and al z. I might have exaggerated the results of that in my earlier posts but to say another leader automatically pops up with the organization in place is silly talk. Yes it could turn out that way but it could turn out my way as well.