Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tyc:> who wrote (41156)	5/27/2007 11:50:51 AM
From: koan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78420

Tyc, that was the one sentence I was thinking of when I said the summary was simplistic. As you know better than most wt value is totally relative to many things. YOu can never make a blanket statement wts should generate a 2 to 1 leveraage >>"....warrants which have the potential to generate a 2 to 1 leverage, meaning if the underlying common stock goes up 100% then the warrants will increase 200%".<< I think the author was just dividing the wt price into the stock price. PS, I am really starting to warm up to those EPM wts and will buy more next week. I am thinking about selling my GCR and bidding for EPM wts. I also now like the EPM A's better than the B's. As EPM pushes further into the money the spread between then a's and B's will increasingly reflect the different strike prices which I believe are $1.20 and $1.55 (off my head?). .35 intrinsic value while now the spread between the two wts is only .10.