SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (41164)5/27/2007 12:11:07 PM
From: tyc:>  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78421
 
>>PS, I am really starting to warm up to those EPM wts

koan, you are an enigma ! EPM warrants apparently do not meet the desirable threshold leverage of 2:1. i.e If the stock goes up 100% to $3 per share, the b warrant would have an intrinsic value of (3-1.55) $1.45, which is less than a 200% increase over its present price of .54c. Why the enthusiasm if this is the case ? Anybody ?

start .54
100% increase $1.08
200% increase = $1.62



To: koan who wrote (41164)5/28/2007 11:42:18 PM
From: AuBug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78421
 
Me too, I plan to also add the EPM.wt.a's to my b's. BTW, I think that guy meant only but warrants with at least 2x leverage.