Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : New FADG. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kumar who wrote (1368)	6/3/2007 8:56:07 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4152

Kumar, there is a logical gap there. Iran, India and China need energy. Iran has lots of oil. Capital fills the gap. The capital is being used to build expensive nuclear power stations and pipelines to India and power stations in India. It could be used right there in Iran to build thermal power stations instead of in India and China. Cancel the pipeline and shipping to India and China, and India and China could build nuclear power plants which are instead being built in Iran. I guess you have heard the expression "coals to Newcastle". You have been conned! Refineries can be built in Iran as easily as India and China. The pipeline doesn't need to be built at all, keeping the gas to supply local electricity production. Of course, there is actually enough hydrocarbon in Iran to supply India via pipeline and also thermal stations in Iran. But they want nuclear bombs to blow up Jews and others in Islamic Jihad. Occam's Razor gets answers quickly. Mqurice PS: I don't see why you sent me a link to this stream via PM. I guess you didn't like some ideas I suggested. I wonder which ones.