Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : New FADG. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (1507)	6/8/2007 9:13:37 AM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 4152

Plame wasnt covert for more years than the law stated so there was no violation. They nailed Libby because he like to the Grand Jury. It may be a still sentence for a lie that had nothing to do with the case, but it was still a lie. Nixon should pardon him. I cant say pardon without thinking of Nixon.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (1507)	6/8/2007 9:17:37 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4152

could you explain to me why no charge was ever brought? She was not covert....ergo....no violation.....

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (1507)	6/8/2007 10:45:35 AM
From: GST	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4152

The issue is clear -- a covert CIA agent puts their life at risk -- and the value of a covert CIA agent as a national security asset is lost when their identity is revealed. The lives of many others are also put at risk. This was a valid grand jury investigation into the persons responsible for harming national security at the White House. By lying and obstructing this investigation, Libby received and deserves to go to jail.