Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (22033)	6/16/2007 1:20:45 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46821

I don't have the BG to discuss this, except to say that what little I know of it is that disgruntled employees, etc, can really hurt in this area.

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (22033)	6/16/2007 9:36:03 PM
From: Norrin Radd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46821

"...However, and this is a late afterthought, I don't believe that the law has kept pace with technology in this respect, but I'd have to check further on this..." Quite true, for example VoIP telephone service is NOT subject to the same wiretapping protection of a "regular" land-line. VoIP can be tapped "legally" and many care not about the morality and serious privacy issues involved. This is a fact and I know of companies that are working on software to exploit this fact in the US. Pitiful but true. What makes me angry and sad is that most people have absolutely NO CLUE that what I just stated is a fact. They think they have privacy protected by law when in this case it is simply not true. Congress needs to wake up !!!