SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rambi who wrote (234314)6/26/2007 6:50:07 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
That's a new one. I hadn't noticed that, but you are right. There is an insult etiquette. <a breach of insult etiquette, since he didn't allow for subtle escalation, >

Also, I'm with you on the "How come they didn't understand what I very clearly said?"

Back on the insults, just today I decided against some escalation and actually deleted some as the insults I was replying to weren't inspirational, but simply garden-variety "POS" style. My insult in reply lacked the quality aspect you mentioned. The few times I have decided to try out personal insults, they lack conviction. Without conviction, the quality tends to be missing too.

I did make a puny pig-related one for Sarman yesterday, thought better of it, but decided to leave it for lack of inspiration.

When insults get to a good level, it's time to go for 3D therapy.

Mqurice



To: Rambi who wrote (234314)6/26/2007 6:50:47 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
That postdated X's repeated accusation that I wish another 9/11 would happen to her. She twisted a point I was trying to make into a senseless, stupid and dishonest accusation. Or ad hominem, if you prefer.

At least her words about blowing up her own family were direct. Nobody had to invent anything to carry on an insult war with her.