Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (101695)	7/2/2007 7:35:54 PM
From: pompsander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

I would have had no problem deferring prosecution on Clinton and then pursuing it after his term...but in effect this was done. He was disbarred (or surrendered his law license) in two States (I think), and the matter just fell away. Somehow if Clinton was in front of a jury explaining why he lied about cheating on his wife, and this was the basis of the perjury and obstruction charge....I suspect the result might not have been too harsh..but the jury could have decided and then let the sentencing be done! That happened with Libby...but Mr. Bush intervened.