SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (342368)7/7/2007 12:10:56 PM
From: combjelly  Respond to of 1572219
 
"Your argument has a nice ring to it but in practice it's just false."

What does that have to do with the issue? This is a sound bite issue. Reality and facts don't apply, but speculation and highly theoretical scenarios do. So, the fact that all of the other industrialized countries have managed to pull it off to one extent or another is irrelevant. It can be easily countered because
a) Such arguments are reality-based and hence, don't apply.
b) If a scenario, no matter how contrived or disconnected from reality can be framed that is shorter and easier to understand than the reality, the shorter argument wins. So this means that a more invasive and riskier procedure will always be chosen because it is more expensive...



To: Road Walker who wrote (342368)7/7/2007 1:50:40 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1572219
 
JF, > Then why is health care so much cheaper in countries with single payer?

You mean like Canada, a place where you have to wait many months to have a simple procedure done? A place that is struggling to try and keep doctors from leaving? A place that relies on America for most advances in drug and medical research?

Great way to control costs ...

Tenchusatsu