SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (236087)7/13/2007 12:51:02 AM
From: Constant Reader  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Everyone knows that the only one who make a mistake on SI is you. The rest of us are preternaturally disposed to always be correct (and unfailingly polite as well). In a way, you can take pride in being without doubt the most widely (and independently) documented poster in SI history. The voluminous files probably fill more than one small room in a few different states.

With an eye to making a few extra bucks, I was working on a handy-dandy cross-reference of your posts, arranged by key word & phrase, and further sorted by outraged response, feigned indignance, ax-grinding specialty, and incoherent rant, but the old machine I was using could not handle the pressure and blew up instead. Rather like events on SI. I had hoped to put my sister's third child through college with the proceeds. Ah, well.

(As for baked boys, or whatever it is: FWIW, If that story was reported by Michael Yon (I don't feel like wading through the crap to find out), it has an extraordinarily high likelihood of being true. Yon has a proven track record of some years standing, and doesn't pull punches in his reporting in the field or in the staff rooms. While it may be true that AQ are rational actors most of the time, it is not true that everyone claiming to be AQ in Iraq is in fact AQ and more than a few AQ members have proven to be quite irrational. Remember, this is a group that ordered produce sellers to separate their fruits and vegetables by sex under pain of death for failing to do so. While the sex of some may seem obvious, I imagine that more than one produce seller was flummoxed at how to go about determining the sex of others.)



To: epicure who wrote (236087)7/14/2007 7:21:44 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
NEVER!

Well. maybe one..... or two........ or three.... or four ...... or ......

Look, let's each research the matter, produce an official, definitive count, and maybe we can settle this that way. :-)