Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBTFD who wrote (103196)	7/16/2007 2:39:27 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

"The fact is we are their to support not to rule " "Your opinion only." It is the position of the United States Government, Mark. Not my opinion. "Do you actually think that we would allow them to do whatever they want with their oil? Be honest now. 'Allow' is a loaded and inappropriate descriptor. "I just believe in calling things what they are. I don't believe in delusional pretense. Your descriptors are all loaded in transparent calculated partisan rhetoric ... and I believe you know it.

To: JBTFD who wrote (103196)	7/16/2007 2:45:59 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

"It depends on what one's definition of "succeed" is. You refused to answer those questions straight forward so I will try again to get an honest response from you. Definition of success: The freely elected government of Iraq doesn't fall to insurgencies, terrorist groups, or violent civil discord. They are instead able to strengthen their security forces to such a degree that the US military support is not needed for this type of success. Do you support that? If you do, do you agree that the support of the US military is necessary.