Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (212590)	7/19/2007 6:11:19 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 793970

"you have to plan or execute violent acts to destabilize Iraq for it to apply to you." You mean that's not a consitutional right?

To: D. Long who wrote (212590)	7/19/2007 9:32:00 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793970

>> you have to plan or execute violent acts to destabilize Iraq for it to apply to you. Says who? You? Show me where in the executive order it says that is the only case where this may apply. As I said, it is too broad and dangerous. As to your other nonsense about Habeas Corpus, read up on the case of Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri, a legal resident of the United States who is held without charges. Five years later, on June 11, 2007, in al-Marri v. Wright, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Military Commissions Act doesn't deny al-Marri his constitutional rights to challenge his accusers. The court ruled that al-Marri must be released from military detention to either be freed or to be placed in US civilian detention where the federal government would have to charge him with crimes. But it should not have had to come to that.