SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (237658)7/30/2007 1:17:18 PM
From: wbmwRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: There has to be a misunderstanding somewhere. Because this is so blatant.

I can't believe it. CJ has an epiphany.



To: combjelly who wrote (237658)7/30/2007 2:13:20 PM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Maybe you should stop playing anti-trust lawyer?



To: combjelly who wrote (237658)7/30/2007 2:38:45 PM
From: PetzRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Sewell must be an absolute idiot to say what he said. Maybe he was misquoted. Maybe he was talking in terms of percentages of their "target number." But even that would be illegal.

Petz



To: combjelly who wrote (237658)7/31/2007 11:21:49 AM
From: smooth2oRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
re: violation of the law

What law?

Who says you can't have a pricing schedule on uP from qty 1 to 200M per year. Any customer would fall within that schedule.

Who says you can't have a pricing schedule for each customer or each size of customer?

Smooth


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News