SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (237662)7/30/2007 1:34:01 PM
From: wbmwRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: The thing you need to understand that if Sewell hasn't been mis-quoted, Intel is royally screwed.

I believe Sewell is familiar with the law.

Re: If, as Sewell seems to be saying, they actually have and are occurring, then the game is over for Intel.

There you have it. Expert legal advise from anonymous Silicon Investor resident, Combjelly.

Somehow, I won't be holding my breath waiting for that instant judgement against such an obvious legal faux-pas....

Especially when AMD's own legal council responds with:

AMD’s Diamond replies: “If, in fact, Intel’s corporate policy is to use only reasonable, stepped discounts and no first-dollar rebates, that’s a pretty recent innovation, and I guess we’ve earned part of our legal fees already. That has not been historically correct.”



To: combjelly who wrote (237662)7/30/2007 2:24:37 PM
From: Sarmad Y. HermizRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
>> then the game is over for Intel.

I believe this issue is one that is looked at closely in the market. If your interpretation is correct, INTC share price would be dropping hard. But it isn't. INTC is up a couple %.