SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pgerassi who wrote (237709)7/30/2007 3:19:33 PM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Pete, is your law degree also from the Silicon Investor Correspondence School of Law? Or is it the Google Institute? You supply no links, and the quote did not say the percentage was of the OEM's "total sales".



To: pgerassi who wrote (237709)7/30/2007 3:33:44 PM
From: Sarmad Y. HermizRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
>> Basing it on what the customer bought before is just as illegal as a percentage of their business.

As doug pointed out many times today, without anyone rebutting his argument, AMD apparently does not agree with your assertion. Their (AMD) staement makes it seem that if Intel had in fact been doing what it (Intel) claimed it was doing, that there would not be any grounds for complaint.



To: pgerassi who wrote (237709)7/30/2007 4:28:15 PM
From: PetzRespond to of 275872
 
re: That is one of the reasons why they lost. The fine and remedy were what was far too lenient. Breaking up the company would have been the proper result given the trial.

The remedy was so ridiculously light that effectively MSFT won.

Petz