SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (345110)7/31/2007 4:58:55 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573504
 
Like how the NAACP paid for an ad about that guy chained to the back of the truck and Bush. Was bush found guilty of that before the NAACP accused him ?

Oh wait you already said blacks are exempt from the Law.



To: tejek who wrote (345110)7/31/2007 7:38:08 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573504
 
Ted, > The NAACP is asking that Vick be given a fair trial and not be convicted in the court of public opinion before the trial has begun. I thought that was our system of jurisprudence. Do you disagree?

Did the NAACP give the same "jurisprudence" to the three Duke lacrosse players?

I saw yesterday that Vick's co-conspirator plead guilty as part of a plea-bargain deal with prosecutors. I guess they're all trying to corner the "big dog."

Sure, innocent until proven guilty, but that won't stop dog owners like me from tossing doggy bags into a trash can lined with Vick's jersey ... ;-)

Tenchusatsu