Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (104358)	8/3/2007 11:08:50 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

"The question should be whether the US has a right to occupy Iraq. The answer is a resounding No. There was some question as to whether the US had the right to go to war against Saddam but that is somewhat irrelevant now. Once Saddam was defeated the government of Iraq was vacant. The USA had not only the right but the responsibility to stay and do their best to support the effort to build Iraqi security. "Some of us have been focused on the WH, Pentagon and the State Dept. in our criticisms and attacks." Of course but if you didn't have Iraq you would have used some other excuse to attack them just as vehemently. Very transparent partisan extremism indeed. "This is direction the finger of damnation should be pointed. They'll all be damned. It isn't polite to point and its really crazy to keep pointing at mirrors while cussing, you should stop that sillyness.