SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (61602)8/3/2007 3:14:54 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
I do think it's possible he was shot by accident. You are creating a straw man here. I think the coverup and the situation are suspicious- but do I know what happened? No. Did I say I knew what happened? No. You just made up something else. Amazing. It is more likely he was fragged than that there was a giant conspiracy. It is also quite possible he was just shot by friendly fire. Do I know how to weigh these two possibilities? No.

"I still don't know why is it so impossible for liberals to think Tillman could have been shot by accident?"

I do think it's possible he was shot by accident- but I certainly don't know for sure. Why do you need to make stuff up constantly about liberals? Why distort everything? I mean there's plenty we disagree about, but your distortions make conversation impossible, since who wants to be constantly saying "Look, that's not what I said".



To: Brumar89 who wrote (61602)8/3/2007 3:51:48 PM
From: Geoff Altman  Respond to of 90947
 
To the paranoid left. In reality, FU's happen and that's the simplest explanation for Tillman's death.

Why should anyone just accept the rational explanation when there are so many conspiracies and evil plots that can be made to fit? After all, there are no regular people in the military, just a bunch of murderous thugs right?........<ggg>