SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pompsander who wrote (7143)8/9/2007 3:16:55 AM
From: John Carragher  Respond to of 25737
 
he sure upsets the democrats for a president who does nothing.



To: pompsander who wrote (7143)8/9/2007 7:14:29 AM
From: JDN  Respond to of 25737
 
the treatment of Clinton was NOTHING compared to that of Bush. Most of the names attributed to Clinton that I can remember related to his actual actions, like SLICK WILLY etc. But when Bush is gone YOU will learn what I KNOW how IMPORTANT Bush really was to our economy and safety. jdn



To: pompsander who wrote (7143)8/9/2007 8:04:22 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
But you didn't answer my question: Is it o.k. for conservatives to have called Clinton all the names they did for whatever he did?

Name calling is hardly the issue, the issue is criticizing the President for foreign policy issues and emboldening the enemy, this is the real crime against America perpetrated by the socialist politicians right here at home... when has any conservative ever done this to bj clinton?

GZ™


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News