Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ogi who wrote (46672)	8/9/2007 12:09:02 PM
From: jackjc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78426

Agree Ogi, the insiders could never have distributed their sh in the mkt at that price without caving it, and taking a very long time to boot.

To: ogi who wrote (46672)	8/9/2007 12:50:37 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78426

<I believe the exact opposite, management is not selling too cheap for them but by the strength of their control block they are indeed selling other people's stock too cheap.> How can they NOT be selling their own stock, but they ARE selling my stock? They are deciding to sell both as far as I can see... if you know of some way that this is not true I'd certainly like to hear about it. Your statement: <management is not selling too cheap for them> tells me that there is simply a discrepancy between one sellers view of price (good/bad) and another (yours)? <they control the destiny of the co. and that bestows a moral and ethical premise of exemplary stewardship> I don't disagree... buuuuuuuuuuuut, there are all sorts of cases where management with little or no stake sell everyone elses stock (agree or recommend mergers) AND get all sorts of perks for doing so! DAK