Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (104916)	8/9/2007 5:35:21 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

"What many more years? We were into recovery by the end of 1933. You conceded that yourself. Why post something false as if it's worth considering? I thought you tried to conduct yourself with dignity?" You are quibbling over terms to attack a strawman. Feel free it doesn't offend me and I find no cause to defend positions I haven't taken, even when you falsely assign them to me. The term recovery is used in many contexts, like signals that recovery was on its way, a specific time which it started, or the period of time before recovery was complete, or a date in which complete recovery could be declared. I am pretty sure you aren't too stupid to see that. Much of that can be argued by historical economists and I have no dog in that fight. Whatever you think your dispute with me is over FDR, I certainly have not engaged in it in anyway. My only dispute with you on this topic, is your tendency to attribute false positions onto me and your fondness for using inappropriate invective.