SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (7178)8/9/2007 10:31:10 PM
From: pompsander  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25737
 
"There was no national interest involved."

Right... peace and prosperity and Democracy in Europe.... (what could *possibly* interest America in that? :-)
__________________

So, we are now "at war" (although no war has been declared by Congress) and it is wrong to criticize American Foreign Policy, but back in 1998 when we had soldiers, sailors and marines involved in Kosovo and we were very engaged along with our NATO allies in REMOVING A BRUTAL DICTATOR WHO KILLED HIS OWN PEOPLE (sound familiar), it was okay for the republicans to loudly criticize every aspect of the Administration's policy, including logistics, strategy, tactics, use of allies, fear of nationbuilidng, etc.

The difference is, supposedly, that ending ethnic cleansing and terrotorial expansion in Europe's southeast did not suit America's interest. This despite the fact that Russia was also committed to Slobo and the Serbian hegemony in the area and the impact of the problem was pouring over into Bulgaria, Greece and north as well...

Frankly, this is a distinction without a difference and I don't buy it. I think it was fine to criticize Clinton's policy then. And it is fine to criticize Bush's policy now. I don't remember the republicans being concerned that the thousands of soldiers, sailors and airmen serving in that theatre would have their morale harmed by their loud criticisms.

Truly,