Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (347479)	8/19/2007 2:12:50 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572637

Ted, who ends up paying for all the socialistic programs that the Democrats want? Not the poor, because they have nothing to tax. The rich? Sure, but they'll never tax themselves back into the middle class. The ones who get up getting it in the end are those in the middle class who have the potential to become rich and achieve the American dream. High taxes will ensure that they'll never become rich, at least not with good old fashioned hard work, ingenuity, and frugality. Hence, you can either afford to be a Democrat, or you can't afford to be anything but a Democrat. For everyone else, there's conservatism ... ;-) Tenchusatsu

To: tejek who wrote (347479)	8/19/2007 10:29:27 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572637

Obama defends himself against rivals By MIKE GLOVER, Associated Press Writer 8 minutes ago Democrat Barack Obama on Sunday accused his presidential rivals of political maneuvering for saying he lacks experience and he insisted he could handle the rigors of international diplomacy. The candidates began their latest debate by critiquing the freshman senator's recent comments on Pakistan and whether he would meet with foreign leaders — including North Korea's head of state — without conditions. "To prepare for this debate I rode in the bumper cars at the state fair," the Illinois lawmaker said to laughter and applause from the audience at Drake University. The debate capped an intense week of politicking in Iowa, an early voting state in the process of picking a nominee. The Iowa State Fair is a magnet for White House hopefuls each presidential election. This year was no exception, especially for Democrats who swept into the state after a GOP straw poll last week. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said she and Obama disagreed over how to conduct international relations with leaders who have been foes of the United States. Obama said at an earlier debate that he would have no qualms about sitting down with leaders of renegade nations such as Cuba, North Korea and Iran. "I do not think that a president should give away the bargaining chip of a personal meeting with any leader unless you know what you are going to get out of that," the New York senator and former first lady said. Obama also has said he would send U.S. troops into Pakistan if the president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, failed to act on specific intelligence about terrorists. The U.S. intelligence director has said he thinks Sept. 11 mastermind Osama bin Liden is living in the border region of Pakistan, and Musharraf's attempt to broker a political solution with tribes had backfired by giving al-Qaida room to regroup. Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., directly addressing a question about Obama's relative inexperience, said: "You're not going to have time in January of '09 to get ready for this job." Dodd has served in Congress for more than 30 years. Former Sen. John Edwards said Obama's opinions "add something to this debate." But Edwards, the 2004 vice presidential nominee, said politicians who aspire to be president should not talk about hypothetical solutions to serious problems. "It effectively limits your options," Edwards said, drawing agreement from one rival, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson agreed. In response, Obama said: "This is part of what I think Americans get frustrated about in politics where we have gamesmanship and we manufacture issues and controversies instead of talking about the serious problems that we have."