Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : New FADG. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (3252)	8/20/2007 11:22:29 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4152

I see. I already mentioned that it was odd. There is, however, no information in that article supporting your presumptions (choice/slavery). Furthermore you are quite comfortable in attaching this really weird anamoly to 'a group' which you further disrespect with your emphatic repetitions of 'unmentionable'. Your implication that because this guy has been able to pull this weird and sensational anomoly off without criminal charges, so it is a valid criticism of Islam and any Muslim is ... uh 'unmentionable'. "Allowing a man to marry four wives, have as many kids as possible with each, then divorce them willy nilly and replace them with new "wives" in order for him to reach his goal of 100 children seems morally wrong to me. The main reason it seems wrong is because women wouldn't accept this situation if they had any choice. They aren't much above slaves." "...seems morally wrong to me" What moral Elroy?