SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich Bloem who wrote (68108)8/21/2007 11:51:36 PM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 197452
 
<With the exception of those A**H**** that reside in Newport Beach. And, they too will see the errors of their ways.>

its not personal, its business:)



To: Rich Bloem who wrote (68108)8/22/2007 1:13:51 PM
From: pyslent  Respond to of 197452
 
What has changed with the current negotiations? Well, Nokia has taken the position that their IPR is now much greater than the first time around.

Another difference is Spinco. IMO, the 2001 deal would not have gotten done without the threat of Spinco.



To: Rich Bloem who wrote (68108)8/27/2007 9:13:24 AM
From: waitwatchwander  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197452
 
What has changed with the current negotiations? Well, Nokia has taken the position that their IPR is now much greater than the first time around ...

AND Qualcomm's fundamental cdma patents are coming to the end of their patent protection life. That is a matter that doesn't seem to garner much attention in those negotiations.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News