SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Lokness who wrote (217486)8/28/2007 5:01:37 PM
From: gamesmistress  Respond to of 793914
 
In a small-population state like Idaho, the Statesman is probably the only statewide paper. According to Craig's most recent statement, the Statesman has "relentlessly and viciously harassed" him and his family for 8 months. He ain't seen nothing yet. Has the arresting officer made any appearence on cable TV yet?

Read the full text of Sen. Larry Craig's statement to the media
- Idaho Statesman
Edition Date: 08/28/07

"First, please let me apologize to my family, friends, staff, and fellow Idahoans for the cloud placed over Idaho. I did nothing wrong at the Minneapolis airport. I regret my decision to plead guilty and the sadness that decision has brought to my wife, family, friends, staff, and fellow Idahoans. For that I apologize.

"In June, I overreacted and made a poor decision. While I was not involved in any inappropriate conduct at the Minneapolis airport or anywhere else, I chose to plead guilty to a lesser charge in the hope of making it go away. I did not seek any counsel, either from an attorney, staff, friends, or family. That was a mistake, and I deeply regret it. Because of that, I have now retained counsel and I am asking my counsel to review this matter and to advise me on how to proceed.

"For a moment, I want to put my state of mind into context on June 11. For 8 months leading up to June, my family and I had been relentlessly and viciously harassed by the Idaho Statesman. If you've seen today's paper, you know why. Let me be clear: I am not gay and never have been.

"Still, without a shred of truth or evidence to the contrary, the Statesman has engaged in this witch hunt. In pleading guilty, I overreacted in Minneapolis, because of the stress of the Idaho Statesman's investigation and the rumors it has fueled around Idaho. Again, that overreaction was a mistake, and I apologize for my misjudgment. Furthermore, I should not have kept this arrest to myself, and should have told my family and friends about it. I wasn't eager to share this failure, but I should have done so anyway.

"I love my wife, family, friends, staff, and Idaho. I love serving Idaho in Congress. Over the years, I have accomplished a lot for Idaho, and I hope Idahoans will allow me to continue to do that. There are still goals I would like to accomplish, and I believe I can still be an effective leader for Idaho. Next month, I will announce, as planned, whether or not I will seek reelection.

"As an elected official, I fully realize that my life is open for public criticism and scrutiny, and I take full responsibility for the mistake in judgment I made in attempting to handle this matter myself.

"It is clear, though, that through my actions I have brought a cloud over Idaho. For that, I ask the people of Idaho for their forgiveness.

"As I mentioned earlier, I have now retained counsel to examine this matter and I will make no further comment."



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (217486)8/29/2007 2:41:32 AM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793914
 
Wow, this story sure has legs now!"

Like a millipede> republicans have already hung the guy. do they know he is gay? Is he gay? He claims no!

what was he arrested for, touching a foot to another person in adjoining stall, and putting hand under stall.

He was not arrested for verbal conversation asking for sex. No discussion about money, details , only body movements from one stall he was in to an undercover cop who says his foot extended over to his stall and his hand.

I await to see if an appeal is possible. If appeal i wonder if cops evidence is strong enough to produce or sustain charges.

Shouldn't cop have waited until they engaged into some type of conversation over sex before assuming the guy was trying to have sex with him? I hope he has better lawyers than qualcomm.