SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (241169)9/6/2007 2:49:00 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
They gave up gaza. Wasnt that the same thing? Or are you splitting hairs over the difference between Judea and Samaria and gaza in the bible.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (241169)9/6/2007 2:50:17 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
If giving it up leads to a material decrease in israeli security i would be against doing it too. I dont think you can make the case that to date giving up gaza has made israel less secure.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (241169)9/7/2007 9:03:27 AM
From: SARMAN  Respond to of 281500
 
There is an important philosophical point here: if the Israelis give up all the land of the WB and Gaza not for a pragmatic reason, but because "it's Arab land", then what right do they have to be in any part of Israel? The Arabs say that's Arab land too.
So it is like this? hmmm. We steal land, we do not give back so you do not get what we stole earlier and we steal more land and the game goes on and on. Nadine how low can you go?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News