SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (239907)9/6/2007 6:24:10 PM
From: graphicsguruRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
I guarantee the timing of Henri's departure is no
coincidence. What it means exactly is up for speculation.

If Henri had planned his departure for a long time, and
it had been completely amicable, his successor would
have been announced at the same time as his departure.
Since that didn't happen, it's some kind of a surprise.

Maybe he got an offer he couldn't refuse from Freescale.
He went to Hector with it. Hector couldn't match it.
Hector said, "If you don't have enough faith in this
company to stick around and value the stock options
we've given you as gold, then get your butt out of here
before we introduce Barcelona."

That's the most positive spin for AMD I can invent.

All the other theories I can come up with involve Hector
firing Henri for something that didn't turn out right,
that Hector viewed as Henri's responsibility. Perhaps it's
something in the past. Perhaps it's something in the
current quarter. The fact that it was obviously hasty
suggests it might be something in the current quarter.
Maybe Henri and Hegberg jointly screwed something up
(ATI sales ?) this Q very badly and each pointed
the finger at the other. So now they're both gone.

I agree that they're unlikely scapegoats for the Barcelona
delay. But there's some reason why they're gone. And
knowing or having decided that, Hector chose to make it
happen before the Barcelona launch. Why? You can be
sure there's a reason.



To: TimF who wrote (239907)9/6/2007 6:24:55 PM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Let's turn it around. If they expected great performance from Barcelona that would meaningfully improve AMD's position against Intel, it would be an incredibly stupid time to leave, given that AMD stock is low, and they would stand to benefit a great deal by sticking around for its Barcelona-enabled appreciation.



To: TimF who wrote (239907)9/7/2007 2:10:27 AM
From: wbmwRespond to of 275872
 
Re: Even if Barcelona does as bad as you think it would hardly be proof that they left because of the poor performance. Coincidences happen all the time, they aren't rare and they often aren't very good evidence of all that much.

Tim, I think you and others have made your point.

Some of us just choose to read between the lines and make our own conclusions. If you are investing in AMD, you should place your bets according to what you personally believe.