Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Oil Sands and Related Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (17796)	9/22/2007 2:25:30 PM
From: johnlw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25575

They are already paying the 25% on some "older" production. So the 33% rate would would be an additional 8% on that oil. 80 cents on your $10 increase. Some 2006 numbers from PCA: Syncrude oil-$72-costs-$30 McKay River bitumen was $29 in 2006-costs $18 petro-canada.ca ECA has some more numbers on their website: encana.com I don't know what you are missing. I don't know what I am missing. I live here. It is going to affect me more than someone in Cal. or Ohio. So far I am all for it btw. My feeling is that it isn't that onerous. One interesting thing I have found in my travels today is the effect of the rising loonie, for COS every cent has a 4cent/unit impact. That from the 2007 Guidance Document. JW