SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (352693)9/28/2007 2:46:12 PM
From: Taro  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575213
 
The Taliban is different. Their goal is to provide stability and adherence to their conception of Islamic principles in their region.

The solution? It is much more of a hearts and minds thing. When the warlords have control, the average Afghani is in the hands of unpredictable forces


The solution? Kill the warlords, all their families and their offspring.
You need to read your Machiavelli, man!

Taro



To: combjelly who wrote (352693)9/28/2007 4:33:47 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575213
 
CJ, here is where you and I differ. Whereas you think the Taliban is only interested in their region, the truth is that the Taliban is closely aligned with Al Qaeda in beliefs and goals.

The obvious evidence (though not sufficient proof, I'll admit) is why the Taliban wouldn't give up bin Laden right after 9/11. If the Taliban's ambitions are truly local, they could have done the smart thing and give up the guy who practically invited Bush to come invade Afghanistan.

Another is the very nature of Al Qaeda itself. As an ideology-based organization which doesn't respect borders and doesn't follow any conventions of warfare, it relies on support from all sources, from individuals, religious groups, and even governments. This coincides very well with the Taliban, whose fundamentalist government is founded on the same ideology.

In any case, the "hearts and minds" strategy of dealing with the Taliban is the same strategy when it comes to dealing with Al Qaeda. You can nail Al Qaeda members whenever they pop up, but as long as their ideology survives, they will continue to pop up and cause havoc. And it doesn't matter if you nail them 99 times for every one time they succeed, 'cause all they need is one.

Hence the reason why I don't believe the two should be treated any differently. There's nothing that would suggest to me that the Taliban's goals are purely regional in scope. They believe what Al Qaeda believes in, and they'll support continued attacks on our homeland and that of our allies until they can reform their base of power.

And then why stop there?

Tenchusatsu