SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 8bits who wrote (91300)9/30/2007 8:38:49 AM
From: tom pope  Respond to of 206131
 
COS-UN.TO have been discussed a number of times on the oil sands thread.

Could you direct me to those posts, if it's not too much trouble? I own a good bunch of the Canroys and try to follow the oil sands thread because it has a lot of savvy people on it, but don't recall a COS specific discussion recently. Thanks.



To: 8bits who wrote (91300)9/30/2007 12:22:02 PM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 206131
 
Not much, really. There seems to be quite a bit of discussion of stocks that do not pay any dividends. David Culver,a very knowledgeable but modest investor, was recommending COS.UN when it was priced at about 10% of its current value. Anyone who bought it then is getting 100% per year return just in dividends.



To: 8bits who wrote (91300)10/1/2007 10:02:06 AM
From: maverick61  Respond to of 206131
 
You would think that someone on the Oil Sands thread would consider this of interest.

Your statement is a strawman, the increased cash flow and distribution increases by COS-UN.TO have been discussed a number of times on the oil sands thread.


8bits - actually his statement is just another in a long number of veiled shots at those folks on the Oil Sands thread which he was deservedly banned from. Nothing more